On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Petr Machata <[email protected]> wrote: > 18.11.2010 11:34, Petr Machata wrote: >> >> 17.11.2010 05:11, Joe Damato wrote: >>> >>> I managed to get access to a few different architectures via the GCC >>> compile farm to test ltrace. These are my findings. >>> >>> Architectures I could not get access to and have not tested: >>> s390 >> >> I have an access to this, will try it before weekend. > > I checked my test-fixes branch. > > s390x (64-bit) is fairly broken in the parameters.exp area, but that was > expected. That would need another week or so of hacking in the same spirit > that I've done for x86 and ppc. > > The rest of tracing is sound, including your libdl test, with an exception > of syscalls test, but that's just because s390 has different syscall naming > scheme in a couple syscalls. That is rather easy to fix, I've got it on the > s390 branch that is forked off your "test" branch.
i've pulled the commits in from your s390 branch. thanks! _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
