On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Joe Damato <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your work on this. I'll apply these patches and test. No > need to do this now, but in the future can you please send each patch > as a separate email to the list (checkout git send-email) to make it > easier to comment on specific patches?
Will do; these were extracted on a lab machine with no direct net access, so I did the lazy thing and sent them from GMail. I'll get my act together :-) > All the patches look OK except patch 4. Is there a reason we need to > update to autoconf 2.65? Doing so makes running autoreconf fail on > some linux distributions with older versions of autoconf. I don't > think we're using any features from 2.65, are we? No, that just eliminated some sort of warning due to AC_PROG_LIBTOOL being deprecated in favor of LT_INIT. I'm sure it's fine without it. Thanks for taking these under consideration; I look forward to a 0.6.0 release. (I'm still working on better Thumb2 support, but that can go in 0.6.1.) I'm about to fire off a whole slew of suggested updates to crosstool-ng, but I'm holding off so that the ltrace update can appear as a new version number rather than a gimongous patch. Cheers, - Michael _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
