On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Michael K. Edwards <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Joe Damato <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for your work on this. I'll apply these patches and test. No >> need to do this now, but in the future can you please send each patch >> as a separate email to the list (checkout git send-email) to make it >> easier to comment on specific patches? > > Will do; these were extracted on a lab machine with no direct net > access, so I did the lazy thing and sent them from GMail. I'll get my > act together :-)
Just noticed that the author tags on these patches are kinda funky: Author: michaedw in build chroot <[email protected]> Would you mind resubmitting your patches with corrected author name / email address and omitting the autoupdate patch? >> All the patches look OK except patch 4. Is there a reason we need to >> update to autoconf 2.65? Doing so makes running autoreconf fail on >> some linux distributions with older versions of autoconf. I don't >> think we're using any features from 2.65, are we? > > No, that just eliminated some sort of warning due to AC_PROG_LIBTOOL > being deprecated in favor of LT_INIT. I'm sure it's fine without it. > > Thanks for taking these under consideration; I look forward to a 0.6.0 > release. (I'm still working on better Thumb2 support, but that can go > in 0.6.1.) I'm about to fire off a whole slew of suggested updates to > crosstool-ng, but I'm holding off so that the ltrace update can appear > as a new version number rather than a gimongous patch. > > Cheers, > - Michael > _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
