Mark Wielaard <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, 2014-05-11 at 23:12 +0200, Petr Machata wrote: >> My mistake, I thought we have a Dwfl per process, but we have one per >> library. Having it stored at process would perhaps fit better with the >> overall design of Dwfl, but I guess there's no bug as things stand now. > > We do have one Dwfl per process for the unwinder support. It is in > struct process and setup once for each leader in proc_add_library if it > doesn't exist yet and if it already exists then proc_add_library will > just add the new Elf to the Dwfl. As far as I understand the new code > this Dwfl is then set as the dwfl of struct library too.
I see it now. So correct me if I'm wrong, but that means that after the first dwfl_report_elf, dwfl_nextcu would iterate over just that one module. However after second dwfl_report_elf, dwfl_nextcu would again iterate over the first module, as well as the second module. If that's correct, then I believe what we should store at struct library is Dwfl_Module, not Dwfl itself. Thanks, PM _______________________________________________ Ltrace-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltrace-devel
