On Thu, 16 May 2002 22:39:12 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Skip,
>
> Cool stuff, but I think it loses its meaning when done like
> this. As far as SNMP is concerned, it's just a bunch of text.
Yep, until you try to parse it on the other end...
> I think the right way is to have an LTSP MIB with individual
> fields for the datapoints you are interested in.
Well, I'm hoping this is what I'm calling the "Redhat MIB", but I don't know for
certain.
> But, I think the standard Linux MIB already has all of that
> data. It's been a while since I looked at it though.
Yeah, it just goes on, and on, and on...
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Fahrl�nder Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
Evansville, IN My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
ICQ 5119262
AOL: WheelDweller
Yahoo: WheelDweller Me: http://www.kamakiriad.com/aboutme.html
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________________
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
