I had and have similar problems getting X to work in lts 3.0. I have
gotten the machines to boot and work, but only with XFree 3.3.6 servers.
I can't seem to get 4.0 servers to work for the life of me. I have tried
different video cards and have used some of those cards previously with
xfree 4, so I know they should work. Auto detect doesn't work at all.
The cards I have tried are a Diamond FireGL1000 pro (both AGP and PCI
versions) Matrox Millenium and Mystyque PCI cards and a fairly new
nvidia based elsa card (using nv driver, not nvidia drivers). I think it
is an xserver problem, but I haven't figured out what yet.

I can tell you that the problem may not be distro specific at all. I am
in fact using Gentoo 1.4rc1 not redhat or mandrake. 

I'll post more when I get it worked out, hopefully it will help someone
else.

-db




On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 06:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Brian,
> 
> The problem you are having with the blank screen in X windows is
> exactly the same problem, whether you are dealing with LTSP 2.x
> or LTSP 3.x.  This is a Server issue with your display manager.
> it makes no difference which version of ltsp.
> 
> And the problem that I think you were having with booting via
> bootrom is indeed related to the newer versions of LTSP which 
> require a kernel command line argument when used with the ISA
> network cards.  unfortunately, there was also a change in
> Etherboot (or was that mknbi) in the way it passes command line
> args to the kernel.  You are using some very old bootroms, and
> you aren't easily able to pass kernel args, unless you follow
> Jason Pattie's article on the ltsp.org contrib page, which shows
> how to use the old etherboot bootrom to load a newer bootrom
> image, which then loads the kernel and passes the parameters
> correctly.
> 
> The other option to the bootrom problem is to either upgrade
> the bootrom to a newer one, or use the boot floppy, like you
> have done.
> 
> So, the only problem you had that was related to differences
> between LTSP 2.x and LTSP 3.x was caused by using an old bootrom
> on an ISA nic.
> 
> There are so many other reasons why LTSP 3.0 is easier.  Namely,
> if you are using a workstation with a PCI nic and a PCI video
> card, the setup is ENORMOUSLY simpler.  Just set XSERVER = auto
> and use the standard LTSP kernel and it all works.
> 
> And, if you do need to tweak the modelines or play with the
> resolution, LTSP-3.0 lets you specify either a full modeline
> on the X_MODE_0 entry, or just a resolution, such as '800x600'
> without all of the rest of the modeline.
> 
> And, LTSP-3.0 allows you to use a MAC address in the lts.conf
> file instead of the hostname or ip address.  This is handy
> when you want to use a pool of dynamic IP addresses in dhcp, 
> instead of static addresses.
> 
> And, what are you gonna do when newer video cards and network
> cards show up ? For the NICs, you would simply need to build new
> kernels (which reminds me of that new years eve a couple years ago
> when I was building kernels and emailing them to you in chicago :)
> But, for the video cards, you will need XFree86 4.x, but LTSP-2.0
> only supports XFree86 3.3.6.
> 
> And, LTSP-3.0 works with more peripherals, such as USB mice and
> printers.
> 
> And, there are other benefits to 3.x vs 2.x, but I just don't
> remember them all now.
> 
> So, if you really want fork the project and stick with LTSP-2.0,
> then by all means, go for it.  The GPL gives you that freedom,
> and I'm very happy that it does.  Just make sure you understand
> the work ahead of you, should you choose to exersize that freedom.
> 
> Jim McQuillan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Brian Fahrlander wrote:
> 
> > 
> >     I'm a big believer in LTSP; when I installed 2.x it was fast, simple and 
>light.  But I've made two, seperate, multi-week install attempts on 3.x and have yet 
>to see an X login screen.  And trying to debug it, even after knowing how to do it 
>before, was darned near impossible.
> > 
> >     This is not to say that there hasn't been a great deal of work, and 
>improvements to the core code...but because it supports so many platforms and 
>variations, it's just gotten so complicated that it's no longer easy or fun anymore. 
> > 
> >     My suggestion:
> > 
> >     Let's take LTSP 2.x, simplify and improve upon it, but just for the 
>Redhat/Mandrake installations.  Let's make two kinds of configurations by default, 
>Jammin-125 and 'custom' and give the admin some basic starting points.
> > 
> >     Wether anyone else wants to do it, I have to.  I plan to install a bunch in 
>this area, and it'll be easier to maintain a partial-distro than to convert from what 
>LTSP has become, to what I need in 99%+ of the situations, ya know?
> > 
> >     Your thoughts?
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Brian Fahrl�nder          GNU/Linux Zealot, Conservative, and Technomad
> > Evansville, IN                    My Voyage: http://www.CounterMoon.com
> > ICQ  5119262
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:
> > With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
> > Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> > http://hpc.devchannel.org/
> > _____________________________________________________________________
> > Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
> >       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> > For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net
> > 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
> With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
> Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> http://hpc.devchannel.org/
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>       https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:  The Best Geek Holiday Gifts!
Time is running out!  Thinkgeek.com has the coolest gifts for
your favorite geek.   Let your fingers do the typing.   Visit Now.
T H I N K G E E K . C O M        http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.openprojects.net

Reply via email to