I would take the hard drive out of 2 computers, and
make an openmosix cluster with the three computers.

This way the 3 computers use 1 hard drive
maybe a second hd on the server machine to handle
backups so you still get to configure 1 computer and
the speed of the three together

Otherwise just install 3 individual computers and
network them normally

To tell you the truth, these two options sound exactly
like the same ammount of work, but the ltsp option is
more cost effective because you will have a much more
efficient use of hard drives 8)

--- Radu Filip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> hello,
> 
> after going through lstp documentation and after
> searching the web, and 
> this mailing archive, I'm still confused if ltsp is
> what I need for my 
> purpose:
> 
> - as opposed to thin client provided by ltsp (based
> on xdmcp), I wish -
> ideally - to be able to have a client that runs
> locally all applications,
> including X, as it were a classic linux desktop.
> 
> why I need this:
> - for a small office lan
> - I have tree pc, all the same class and
> aproximatelly the same cpu-power 
> and ram; oll of them are powerful enough (AMD 1.1
> GHz, 256 RAM, etc)
> and quite identical, only the vide cards are bit
> different (on server: 
> gefrce mx2, on the other two rivatnt)
> - obviously, I don't want to have three different
> linux-es installed on 
> that three pc-s.
> - but in the same time I don't want to waste the
> resurces of those two 
> (cpu, ram) and have only one (the server) that do
> all the work
> - I don't want even to have the same fully
> functional distro from server 
> duplicated on /opt/ltps/i386 (file by file)
> 
> question:
> - is ltsp what I really need for these purposes? if
> not, please point me 
> to the correct solution
> - in "9.4. Application Configuration" section of
> ltsp doc it's said that:
>   "So, the cleanest way to handle this is to have a
> complete tree with
>    all of the binaries and libraries that the
> workstation will need,
>    independent of the server binaries and libraries"
> 
>    can I avoid duplicating distro on server?
> suposing I update a packet
>    or I install a new app, I have to do copy all
> it's files to
>    /opt/ltps/i386, which is adding unwanted
> administration complexity
> 
>    how I can avoid this and reach my goal?
> 
> please help with this issue. if it's needed I can
> provide more details. 
> the linux distro I'm using it's mandrake 9.0
> 
> thank you,
>   radu
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld =
> Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or
> change prefs, goto:
>      
>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on
irc.freenode.net


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to