John,
        you can mix and match *any* thin clients. I have thinknics,
jammins and via base boxes. jammins are much nicer than thinknics -
silent and decent video, via boxes work well with higher resolution than
jammins but you need software cursor ... julius

On 4 Feb 2003, John Clay wrote:

> I have an LTSP server that is hosting one ThinkNIC terminal. I'm ready
> to add two more terminals and, since I don't like fans, I'm interested
> in using the Jammin 125. So, the questions:
>
> 1)  Is there any reason I can't operate both types of terminals from the
> same LTSP server? (I'd assume that terminal specific configuration and
> image files, if the terminals actually need different ones, would just
> be moved into the terminal specific portions of dhcp.conf and lts.conf.)
> Am I on solid ground here or should I stick to one type of terminal?
>
> 2)  Is it generally felt that the Jammin 125 is superior to the
> ThinkNIC? (My ThinkNIC works well but it has a fan - All else equal, I'd
> rather rely on convective cooling than on rotating machinery)



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to