[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Dana,

The dhcpd file looks fine. I was hoping to see a problem with your subnet mask or broadcast address. I've seen that cause big problems.

Ok, lemme ask this, Can you cycle the power on the network switch ?

Sometimes that causes problems.

Also, it looks like you are using Etherboot, what version of Etherboot is it ? I ask, because i've seen problems with some of the 5.2.x versions, and i've seen very good success with 5.0.11. At the point where it is failing for you, Etherboot should be completely out of the picture, but it's worth looking into.

Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Tue, 4 May 2004, Dana Persells wrote:



I didn't think so but I wasn't sure.
Of course...
# Configuration file for ISCD dhcpd
#
# Modified by DFP on 4/27/04 at 12:45 p.m.
#
ddns-update-style         none;
default-lease-time            21600;
max-lease-time                21600;

option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address 192.168.0.255;
option routers 192.168.0.6;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.0.6;
# option domain-name "DanaLinux";
option root-path "192.168.0.6:/opt/ltsp/i386";


option option-128 code 128 = string;
option option-129 code 129 = text;

shared-network WORKSTATIONS {
   subnet 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
   }
}

group   {
   use-host-decl-names       on;
   option log-servers        192.168.0.6;

# Dana's old Windows computer 233Mhz
host ws001 {
hardware ethernet 00:4F:49:00:1A:CB;
fixed-address 192.168.0.102;
filename "/lts/vmlinuz-2.4.24-ltsp-4";
# option option-128 e4:45:74:68:00:00; #This is NOT a MAC address
# option option-129 "NIC=ne IO=0x300";
}


# P100 with 32Meg RAM, 3com905C and Trident video
host ws002 {
hardware ethernet 00:01:02:6e:39:16;
fixed-address 192.168.0.103;
filename "/lts/vmlinuz-2.4.24-ltsp-4";
}
}


I am running Red Hat Linux 9 unpatched though I'm
thinking about going to Fedora after this quietens
down. ;-)
The ltsp is the version 3 straight off the web site. I
thought about 4 but saw that it wasn't an auto and
felt my lack of knowledge would probably get me in
trouble.
Regards and thanks,
Dana
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Dana,

Squid has nothing to do with it.

Can you show me your /etc/dhcpd.conf file ?

Also, what distro are you running ?

Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On Tue, 4 May 2004, Dana Persells wrote:



Well, it isn't the workstation. Using another NIC,
another ws002, etc., the same condition occurs.
Everything runs find until the process goes to


mount


the filesystem from the server and there it sits!
Obviously, the problem is on the server!
I have checked iptables - all accept.
Both workstations are listed in dhcp, lts.conf,


and


hosts and both run, get their IP addresses, open


the


kernel, etc and then hang after dhclient on the


line,


Mounting filesystem from: 192.168.0.6
(which is the server address)
Could squid have anything to do with this? The


reason


I ask is that the name of my server is DanaLinux


with


no dot com or anything else in it. Squid does not
therefore find a fully qualified name as the hosts
entry is
127.0.0.1 DanaLinux localhost


localhost.localdomain


perhaps I should list DanaLinux also on


192.168.0.6


which is eth0 and the internal network address?


DONE &


didn't matter. portmapper and nfsd and mountd are all running.
Regards,
Dana
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover







-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net




I do have the same problem with ltsp-4.
I send a new thread for a time ago without getting an answer (it's happen ;-) ).
Could it be a "client" problem ? (as I have with a sis630 on a client)
Sincerely
Jean Christophe




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to