Aaron,
You've got a nested subnet declaration for 10.0.0.0, inside a subnet
declaration for the same subnet.
Get rid of the inside declaration.
>
> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> use-host-decl-names on;
> option log-servers 10.0.0.1;
> subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
> range dynamic-bootp 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.250;
> }
> }
something like:
subnet 10.0.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
use-host-decl-names on;
option log-servers 10.0.0.1;
range dynamic-bootp 10.0.0.100 10.0.0.250;
}
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -----
>
> A simple glance at ifconfig tells me that eth0 is correctly running on
> 10.0.0.1, and the netmask is also correct. Uplink to the net is on eth1,
> which is, in fact, working.
>
> The setup I'm going for is to have the clients on 10.0.0.0/24, and not
> have to do messy things like specify thier MAC addresses; I just want to
> be able to dynamically add/delete clients at will.
>
> Anyone have any idea on this? Never really messed with DHCP before.
>
> Also, will this work with PXE? I have a VIA EPIA board with onboard LAN,
> and I have confirmed it boots on an LTSP LAN.
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
