On Thu, 2006-11-05 at 11:42 +0200, Zoilo Gomez wrote: > You did not read (understand) my request.
Nope, I didn't. I skimmed it and started replying before I finished reading it! Sorry about the mix up. > I have no performance problems at all. I was just interested in a > factual comparison of the 2 technologies SCSI and SATA. I'm really surprised about that. But, if you're happy with the performance, that's all that counts. > I am not interested in rules and prohibitions, only in experience, facts > and reasoning. Sure, I understand that. I feel the same way. However, what I stated (even though it didn't answer your original question) _was_ based on experience, facts and reasoning. I haven't built large Linux thin client systems based on intuition - that would be suicide. My consulting firm would crash and burn. I apologize again for not understanding what you were looking for. Hopefully some of what I wrote was useful. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.16-1.2108_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 11:15:41 up 1 day, 4:45, 2 users, load average: 0.88, 0.48, 0.22 ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
