Oops - It was SuSE 10.0, not 10.1; I understand there were some problems
with that one from the thread, earlier.
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006, Dave Cotton wrote:
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 00:57 -0400, Krishna Murphy wrote:
> Dave-
>
> I hired a fellow to help me when I started this project who had been
> successful at installing LTSP (and a LOT of other things!) previously, and
> I trust his instincts. He found the SuSE package manager cumbersome, and
> the LTSP install didn't work; after a good long while of fiddling, there
> was no great progress on getting it going so we dumped it and started over.
> I had no great amount of experience with either distro (nor LTSP, which I
> was recommending to my customer) up 'til then, and was happy to follow the
> lead I was getting from my friend.
>
> I'm sure that SuSE could have been made to work, but there was a deadline
> looming and we felt that we'd given enough energy to that approach, as the
> odds of it working QUICKLY with Debian were considered very good. It did!
Thank you for this explanation. I'm sorry to have to say it is exactly
what I expected. When people make sweeping statements like yours it is
often based more on problems of their _own_ making.
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
