"poweroff -f" forces halt to run, which isn't the cleanest way to shut things down. "-f" might be related to an issue lns noticed with thin clients not being able to power back up after shutdown (that has yet to be completely verified). "poweroff -p" should be no different than "poweroff" because poweroff is "halt -p".
I'd argue that "poweroff -p" should be changed to "shutdown -h now" as to allow the shutdown to take care of everything smoothly. Is there a reason *not* to just use the standard and recommended method of "shutdown"? On Thu, 07 May 2009 12:22:02 +0200 Oliver Grawert <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > Am Mittwoch, den 06.05.2009, 11:08 -0700 schrieb Jordan Erickson: > > I took a look in the ldm source code and it > > looks like what you want fixed is line 98 from greeter.c: > > g_spawn_command_line_async("/sbin/poweroff -p", error); > > i implemented that originally as "poweroff -fp", someone recently > changed that in the code, that change should just be reverted ... > > ciao > oli ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
