Marius Flage schrieb: > Den 07.01.2010 15:38, skrev joe auerbach: > >> Was that a bad idea? Should I have just installed the default version >> and been done with it? The whole point of reinstalling was to get the >> speed up. It looks better on the workstation, but did I just screw >> myself by installing the same version of ltsp? > > Just my 2 cents. I had problems with flash when I ran my thin client > environment like this. 64-bit flash is buggy, to say the least. So I had > to change the server from 64- to 32-bit to get it working again. You can > of course just run flash as a local application (which I guess would be > preferably anyway). And 64-bit flash may have been worked on and fixed > since I last tried it. > > - Marius
Yes, when i last tried (october 2009), and 64bit flash was unstable as hell. But you can use 32 bit flash on 64 bit Ubuntu (using nspluginwrapper)! Just apt-get install flashplugin-installer This will take care of everything (install 32 bit flash + nspluginwrapper). I have this setup here, it works really well. Using nspluginwrapper, firefox is actually more stable than without, as flash will run in a seperate nspluginwrapper process and won't take firefox down when it crashes. Jakob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
