On Wednesday 13 January 2010 22:59:40 ltsp-discuss- [email protected] wrote: > > Was that a bad idea? Should I have just installed the default version > > and been done with it? The whole point of reinstalling was to get the > > speed up. It looks better on the workstation, but did I just screw > > myself by installing the same version of ltsp? > > Just my 2 cents. I had problems with flash when I ran my thin client > environment like this. 64-bit flash is buggy, to say the least. So I had > to change the server from 64- to 32-bit to get it working again. You can > of course just run flash as a local application (which I guess would be > preferably anyway). And 64-bit flash may have been worked on and fixed > since I last tried it.
Joe, lest you be intimadated by all the comments 32bit clients 64bit server NOT 64 bit flash (ndiswrapper on 64 bit browser) lib32 for skype etc That is a good, stable, working and nice setup James ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for Conference attendees to learn about information security's most important issues through interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
