Le Mer 19 mai 2010 15:52, Jakob Unterwurzacher a écrit : > On 18/05/10 21:43, jan nilsen wrote: >> So, I have a server with a 1gbit NIC, and 3 16-ports switches (all >> 100mbit ports), that are linked togheter the old switch-in-switch It's the bottleneck, can you plugged in all your thin-client on one of them with the server's link aggregation ?
>> style, and I have about 45 clients (mix of thinclients, workstations >> and laptops). >> >> When most of the machines are in use, I notice that having only >> 100mbit out of the server is not enough. >> >> So I can either buy myself a 48 port switch with 1gbit uplink with >> money we don't have, or I thought I could try this "bonding" thing. >> >> I can put 3 network cards in the server, and connect each of those >> networkcards with it's own 16-port switch, that way I would have >> 300mbit out of the server. >> >> What kind of bonding mode should I choose? >> >> Or is there some other way? >> > > I can't find it right now on the list, but with this kind of setup it > was suggested to put the 3 NICs in different subnets and configure dhcpd > to hand out IPs from the subnet the NIC is in. > You can't and needn't use bonding when you have 3 seperate switches. > > > Jakob > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss > For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net > -- DUMAIS Richard ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
