* Brian Hutchinson ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi, > > First post. I'm trying to determine if the features in the LTTng > version 0.4.3 would be any better than the version of LTT that came > with our MVista 2.6.10 kernel. > > Obviously, my time would be better spent trying to get a newer kernel > & LTTng going but we have an immediate need to debug a 2.6.10 based > app.
I'd recommend trying to run the application under a newer kernel, hoping to reproduce the problem. You might be lucky. I don't see much value in trying to resurrect the first LTTng versions ever published. Thanks, Mathieu > > Does anyone have experience going back this far that can comment? > > I used the older LTT around the time Karim came out with the 1st > version of his Embedded Linux book but I'm not familiar with what > LTTng brings to the table ... I know it is probably the tool of choice > in modern kernels but I'm wondering if we would see any benefit of > attempting to get it working with such an old kernel. > > Regards, > > Brian > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
