* Alexandre Montplaisir ([email protected]) wrote: > >>> You don't want a patch that makes the JNI functions access >>> "marker_field->_offset", do you? I can carry it out-of-tree to restore >>> the previous functionality (and compilability (is that a word?)) for >>> TMF, until they change their parser methods, since they'll probably get >>> hit by the same bug as LTTV. >> Please don't do buggy workarounds at the library level to leave TMF >> causy with its current bugs please. They must fix their app to upgrade >> to the newer library version, period. I'm afraid we cannot release the >> TMF package until they do. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Mathieu > > "Your package is now uploading..." > Ctrl-C, Ctrl-C... > > But still, don't you think a mostly working app with a "KNOWN BUGS:" > disclaimer is better than a completely non-working one? I guess they can > use an older version, which isn't much better.
Leave TMF with the old version until they adapt then. And common.. this is going to take a jiffy to fix. Why has this not been done yet ? The new library has been out for a few weeks already. Thanks, Mathieu > > Matthew: How long do you think it'd take to get fixed? It will require > adjustments both in the jni_interface.c and the JniParser.java code in > TMF, if I remember right. > > Cheers, > Alexandre > >>> Cheers, >>> Alexandre >>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Mathieu >>>> > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
