On 10-09-08 05:47 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
* Alexandre Montplaisir ([email protected]) wrote:
You don't want a patch that makes the JNI functions access
"marker_field->_offset", do you? I can carry it out-of-tree to restore
the previous functionality (and compilability (is that a word?)) for
TMF, until they change their parser methods, since they'll probably get
hit by the same bug as LTTV.
Please don't do buggy workarounds at the library level to leave TMF
causy with its current bugs please. They must fix their app to upgrade
to the newer library version, period. I'm afraid we cannot release the
TMF package until they do.
Thanks,
Mathieu
"Your package is now uploading..."
Ctrl-C, Ctrl-C...
But still, don't you think a mostly working app with a "KNOWN BUGS:"
disclaimer is better than a completely non-working one? I guess they can
use an older version, which isn't much better.
Leave TMF with the old version until they adapt then.
And common.. this is going to take a jiffy to fix. Why has this not been
done yet ? The new library has been out for a few weeks already.
The main reason is that no-one tested the latest and greatest version of
libtraceread for the moment. We are currently working on narowing the
gap with lttv on all versions of the library. That being said, a patch
on TMF's side will be available soonish.
Matthew
Thanks,
Mathieu
Matthew: How long do you think it'd take to get fixed? It will require
adjustments both in the jni_interface.c and the JniParser.java code in
TMF, if I remember right.
Cheers,
Alexandre
Cheers,
Alexandre
Thanks,
Mathieu
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
