Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote: >> On 08/12/2010 11:51 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: >>> Hi, in the latest release 0.5 of lttng-ust >>> (http://lttng.org/files/ust/releases/ust-0.5.tar.gz), I found in the >>> source directory, doc/manual/ust.html says ustctl/libustcmd/ustd are >>> licensed as GPL v2, but the source codes of ustctl/libustcmd/ustd >>> have a LGPLv2.1+ header. I checked >>> git://git.dorsal.polymtl.ca/git/ust.git and it has the same issue. >>> >>> Could somebody please clarify the inconsistency? Thanks! >> >> The licenses in the file have priority. The manual needs to be >> updated. >> >> pmf > > Thanks a lot for the quick clarification! :-)
Hi, today I checked the release of 0.7 and the latest's ust.git. Looks this inconsistency in manual and source cde is still there? Do we have a plan to fix it? And, the COPYING only mentions "GPLv2 or any later version", but doesn't mention LGPL at all. And, the files in ust.git/snprintf/ has a BSD license header. So, what's the "overall" license of lttng-ust -- "LGPL2.1+ & BSD"? Could you please clarify my questions? Thanks very much! Thanks, -- Dexuan _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
