On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Pierre-Marc Fournier wrote:
On 08/12/2010 11:51 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote:
Hi, in the latest release 0.5 of lttng-ust
(http://lttng.org/files/ust/releases/ust-0.5.tar.gz), I found in the
source directory, doc/manual/ust.html says ustctl/libustcmd/ustd are
licensed as GPL v2, but the source codes of ustctl/libustcmd/ustd
have a LGPLv2.1+ header. I checked
git://git.dorsal.polymtl.ca/git/ust.git and it has the same issue.
Could somebody please clarify the inconsistency? Thanks!
The licenses in the file have priority. The manual needs to be
updated.
pmf
Thanks a lot for the quick clarification! :-)
Hi, today I checked the release of 0.7 and the latest's ust.git. Looks this
inconsistency in manual and source cde is still there?
Do we have a plan to fix it?
And, the COPYING only mentions "GPLv2 or any later version", but doesn't
mention LGPL at all.
And, the files in ust.git/snprintf/ has a BSD license header.
So, what's the "overall" license of lttng-ust -- "LGPL2.1+ & BSD"?
LPGPL2.1 for the library parts.
LGPL is more restrictive than BSD so only the specifically BSD licensed
parts may be used under a BSD license.
I can try to fix the license text in the coming release.
/Nils
Could you please clarify my questions? Thanks very much!
Thanks,
-- Dexuan
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
_______________________________________________
ltt-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
