David Goulet <david.goulet <at> polymtl.ca> writes: > >> But, for now, you can fix that quickly by changing this to > >> "libustctl/Makefile.am" from the git source of ust. > >> > >> - $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la > >> + $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la \ > >> + $(top_builddir)/snprintf/libustsnprintf.la > >> > >> Recompile and install ust and should be fine :)
Unfortunately, I still get the same configure results for lttng-tools once ust is recompiled and re-installed. > Actually, there is no "compatible commit" at this time for lttng-tools > and UST. This is why there is no release yet of lttng-tools. It is still > in very active development and should NOT be use in production yet. Okay, I'll put it on ice then. > > I guess what I really need to know is what is the most recent *coherent* > > set of commits from git.dorsal.polymtl.ca and git.lttng.org? > > git.lttng.org for everything! The dorsal git is for internal development > and nothing "really" public. git.lttng.org for everything...except for lttng-tools, right? Since I'm focusing on getting Eclipse LTTng working over TCF, any recommendations as to which git.lttng.org set of releases/commits to use? _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
