* Daniel U. Thibault ([email protected]) wrote: > David Goulet <david.goulet <at> polymtl.ca> writes: > > > >> But, for now, you can fix that quickly by changing this to > > >> "libustctl/Makefile.am" from the git source of ust. > > >> > > >> - $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la > > >> + $(top_builddir)/libustcomm/libustcomm.la \ > > >> + $(top_builddir)/snprintf/libustsnprintf.la > > >> > > >> Recompile and install ust and should be fine :) > > Unfortunately, I still get the same configure results for lttng-tools once > ust is recompiled and re-installed. > > > Actually, there is no "compatible commit" at this time for lttng-tools > > and UST. This is why there is no release yet of lttng-tools. It is still > > in very active development and should NOT be use in production yet. > > Okay, I'll put it on ice then. > > > > I guess what I really need to know is what is the most recent *coherent* > > > set of commits from git.dorsal.polymtl.ca and git.lttng.org? > > > > git.lttng.org for everything! The dorsal git is for internal development > > and nothing "really" public. > > git.lttng.org for everything...except for lttng-tools, right? > > Since I'm focusing on getting Eclipse LTTng working over TCF, any > recommendations as to which git.lttng.org set of releases/commits to use?
See the compatibility list on lttng.org: http://lttng.org/content/download Thanks, Mathieu > > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
