-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Exactly! Thus having a hard dependency is completely out of question.
On 11-06-15 11:21 AM, Yannick Brosseau wrote: > >> Enlighten me Yannick :) >> >> # apt-get install lttng-tools >> >> How are you going to have the UST support without installing the UST >> package >> (assuming that libustcomm is inside ust) ? >> >> I figure you'll have a "Not found libust.so..." at execution time ? > > Exactly, for the *runtime* dependency, that would be a *recommand* and > we detect if libusb is present or not. But that's really up to the > packager to decide how he does it. Each distro might have their own > policies. > > As the upstream developer, you should let the user decide if he want UST > support or not. I might be building an embedded system were space is a > constraint and I would want to only have the kernel tracer and not > bother with he userspace one. > > _______________________________________________ > ltt-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJN+M6aAAoJEELoaioR9I02y2AIALFkB/eEGG6V5of2dDPZ3NbL MegoK0zV1rOh4XlMTuncdIfez7m21eore9FwkLvc2Lc6C0YpmbTmYnJgT52Ngz86 5L5YsHdpnYbkJ929UHwRZNByITmWRMJo71kI8+FAra5zw5EsVA5uRPJs6rvvsqlL Xly+ldJsSUBE2B+1/dlx3oGugQ/3UqszPGdkFIml6HXZo1MnzlYljHg4r1x7a/eq gjFGhlrqRuEC0orYrErK/F647Ng7WZmUcVGHp/5bThXWfKjUjymgNJFzz03YRixl /us0FsZJr7n7Fz34AgJP7qEp/qcgcyGchcaI0seCYmr4yTbgnw1BvGuxzW6BTLg= =zqFf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
