So the 1b) options sounds good in this area. On 2011-06-15 11:24, David Goulet wrote: > Exactly! Thus having a hard dependency is completely out of question. > > On 11-06-15 11:21 AM, Yannick Brosseau wrote: > > >> Enlighten me Yannick :) > >> > >> # apt-get install lttng-tools > >> > >> How are you going to have the UST support without installing the UST > >> package > >> (assuming that libustcomm is inside ust) ? > >> > >> I figure you'll have a "Not found libust.so..." at execution time ? > > > Exactly, for the *runtime* dependency, that would be a *recommand* and > > we detect if libusb is present or not. But that's really up to the > > packager to decide how he does it. Each distro might have their own > > policies. > > > As the upstream developer, you should let the user decide if he want UST > > support or not. I might be building an embedded system were space is a > > constraint and I would want to only have the kernel tracer and not > > bother with he userspace one. > > > _______________________________________________ > > ltt-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
_______________________________________________ ltt-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
