* Christian Babeux ([email protected]) wrote: > Use the proper field designator syntax (C99) to initialize the > ustfork_clone_info struct.
merged, thanks! Mathieu > > Signed-off-by: Christian Babeux <[email protected]> > --- > liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > mode change 100644 => 100755 liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c > > diff --git a/liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c b/liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c > old mode 100644 > new mode 100755 > index 13f77cf..34f674c > --- a/liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c > +++ b/liblttng-ust-fork/ustfork.c > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ int clone(int (*fn)(void *), void *child_stack, int > flags, void *arg, ...) > tls, ctid); > } else { > /* Creating a real process, we need to intervene. */ > - struct ustfork_clone_info info = { fn = fn, arg = arg }; > + struct ustfork_clone_info info = { .fn = fn, .arg = arg }; > > ust_before_fork(&info.sigset); > retval = plibc_func(clone_fn, child_stack, flags, &info, > -- > 1.7.12.2 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
