---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 14:32:54 -0400 From: Mohamad Gebai <[email protected]> To: [email protected], [email protected]
> For the sake of our experience, we pinned vCPU0 of VM1 and vCPU0 of VM2 on > the same physical CPU, and ran a CPU-intensive workload for one second one > each one of them. > We generated our traces using the low-overhead LTTng tracer. We can clearly > see that during that second, both of the virtual CPUs are fighting over the > same physical CPU. You should have said "and ran a CPU-intensive workload for one second on both of them simultaneously". Otherwise you may be misconstrued as meaning you ran the workloads consecutively. (The third sentence dispels this incorrect reading, but it's better to get the meaning across unambiguously the first time) Daniel U. Thibault Protection des systèmes et contremesures (PSC) | Systems Protection & Countermeasures (SPC) Cyber sécurité pour les missions essentielles (CME) | Mission Critical Cyber Security (MCCS) R & D pour la défense Canada - Valcartier (RDDC Valcartier) | Defence R&D Canada - Valcartier (DRDC Valcartier) 2459 route de la Bravoure Québec QC G3J 1X5 CANADA Vox : (418) 844-4000 x4245 Fax : (418) 844-4538 NAC : 918V QSDJ <http://www.travelgis.com/map.asp?addr=918V%20QSDJ> Gouvernement du Canada | Government of Canada <http://www.valcartier.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/> _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
