> > For the sake of our experience, we pinned vCPU0 of VM1 and vCPU0 of VM2 on > > the same physical CPU, and ran a CPU-intensive workload for one second one > > each one of them. > > We generated our traces using the low-overhead LTTng tracer. We can clearly > > see that during that second, both of the virtual CPUs are fighting over the > > same physical CPU. > > You should have said "and ran a CPU-intensive workload for one second on > both of them simultaneously". Otherwise you may be misconstrued as meaning > you ran the workloads consecutively. (The third sentence dispels this > incorrect reading, but it's better to get the meaning across unambiguously > the first time)
I agree! Thank you for the feedback, Mohamad. _______________________________________________ lttng-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
