On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 05:06:04PM +0930, Will Robertson wrote: > On 05/08/2010, at 4:58 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > > > Based on the previous discussion here, I think there is a general > > agreement that a simple wrapper around xunicode is better than forking > > it. > > Where the wrapper == fontspec? (As I just implemented.) > Or do you mean an entirely separate package that is loaded individually? > > I'd prefer to keep things simple for the user who might be using both XeLaTeX > and LuaLaTeX, and I can't think of a good way to provide an interface to the > latter option (the wrapper package idea) without causing confusion.
Myself I'm fine with that, the less packages the better I feel actually (as it generally means less incompatibilities). Regards, Khaled -- Khaled Hosny Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team Free font developer
