Am Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:06:04 +0930 schrieb Will Robertson:
>> Based on the previous discussion here, I think there is a general >> agreement that a simple wrapper around xunicode is better than forking >> it. > Where the wrapper == fontspec? (As I just implemented.) > Or do you mean an entirely separate package that is loaded individually? I think it is good idea if xunicode is loaded by fontspec. People had a tendency to load it at wrong moment (before fontspec). I haven't look at your implementation but I think two things are important: 1. fontspec should load xunicode even if it has already been load before (to force the correct definitions for the EUxx-encodings) or at least give a warning if it has already been loaded. 2. There should be an option "no-xunicode" to supress the loading of xunicode. (Not so useful for users but good for tests. You can't make good minimal documents if packages load tons of other packages.) -- Ulrike Fischer
