On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:57 AM, steve donovan <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm all for reducing the barrier to entry, making it as easy as > possible for people to make and submit rockspecs (Both Cosmin and I > have been thinking of a web GUI version of rockspecifier) but man, we > definitely need namespace rules! > > And the simplest rule is: that top-level name is already in use.
I agree with that, but so far I haven't had a convenient way of verifying this. One possibility is to require that people submitting rockspecs should also submit the generated rock_manifest file. (Someday that collected info could even become a nice "modules tree" web page.) -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
