On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Alexander Gladysh <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:26, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM, steve donovan >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Hisham <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sure, that would be great. However, I can't commit myself to actually >> _run_ the rockspecs we receive. I often do so when the rockspec has no >> external dependencies (and sometimes even when it does) to make sure >> it builds well when something catches my eye. Rockspecs already take >> too long sometimes to be uploaded (and I thank Fabio for helping me >> out on this whenever I'm MIA) and adding an acceptance step when >> someone else is required to actually run them could slow things down >> even more. > > Hisham, we discussed automated smoke test platform for LuaRocks a > couple of times previously on this list. > > I think that it will help here.
Yes, it's always brought up as a nice idea, like a web-based system for submission of rocks that would allow some system of peer reviewing and avoid having me (and Fabio) as the bottleneck for new rocks. Getting those implemented, however, is another story... -- Hisham _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.luaforge.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luarocks-developers
