On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Wesley Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is there a way to have a rockspec that describes a binary module but
> doesn't include a source? I want to have all of the metadata like
> license, description, etc. with the binary rock, but I don't want to
> have the source option be a part.
>
source and source.url are mandatory, but I think you could "abuse" it:
source.url = "file://somewhere/on/your/fs"
Not too sure on this one, though.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
