> Yeah, no reason why it shouldn't work. file:// is recognized as a > protocol and in any case you can use an invalid path if you're just > using rockspecs for the metadata and will never going to use > source.url anyway. We may make source.url optional in a future version > of the rockspec format for situations like this.
Thanks for the info. The only reason I wouldn't want to do this is because it would effectively create an invalid rock on the server, but it's better than nothing. wes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2 _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
