On Tuesday, November 27, 2012 02:16:43 PM Thijs Schreijer wrote: > > They are both "you can do whatever you want and get away with it licenses", > but MIT is a clear legal statement, "public domain" is not. I think clear > is better. If you don't want to provide "explicit legal clearance" so it > can't be used in proprietary products, use GPL, same effect, but clear. > > I don't favor one license over the other, they all serve their purpose. But > I do prefer clarity. >
Just to put the final word on this particular license discussion, before it strays too far away from Lua, but the misconceptions about Public Domain are what led CC0 (http://creativecommons.org/about/cc0) being written. It's a way to unambiguously waive copyright. -- tom <tellia...@whoopdedo.org> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep yourself connected to Go Parallel: DESIGN Expert tips on starting your parallel project right. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
