> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thijs Schreijer [mailto:th...@thijsschreijer.nl]
> Sent: zondag 7 april 2013 8:27
> To: luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Luarocks-developers] MinGW and LuaSocket
> 
> > Actually, if you have a proper Windows environment for LuaRocks
> > working, it's probably easier to just build and pack those rocks
> > again... which brings me to some questions on what to do regarding the
> > .zip distribution. The LuaRocks .zip file for Windows includes Lua 5.1
> > binaries based on msvc*80.dll (which, I believe, are from
> > LuaBinaries).
> >
> > 1) Should we keep including those?
> Might be as good as any, but... Microsoft updates the runtimes mostly
> every Visual Studio release. I find myself still working with VS2008,
> still no 2011 or 2012. So it is hard to find a constant you can support
> without getting incompatibilities every few years, many users will have
> different runtimes. And when you switch defaults, the user would have to
> update all his libraries.
> 
> > 2) Should we include mingw binaries instead?
> That would be the only constant possible (at least that is why I put up an
> effort to get my system on MinGW)
> 
> > 3) If the answer to question 2 is "yes", can anyone point me to mingw
> > binaries we could use?
> That would be a simple one of update of the repo, I have them working, so
> could supply them. But then again; I'm a noop with compiler commandlines,
> so maybe it's safer to use binaries that Steve created :)
> 
> > 4) Should we include both Lua 5.1 and Lua 5.2 binaries on Windows and
> > add flags to the installer asking which one the user want? (Possibly
> > both?)
> Primary question is how you want to proceed with Lua5.2 support. If this
> is the way, then adding it shouldn't be that big a deal.
> 
> Thijs
> 

As an idea; wouldn't it be possible to create a binary rock for Lua itself?
Let Rocks simply use its own binaries (it's an install option, but generally 
windows users really don't care I think)

So install LuaRocks, including its own Lua binaries in a self contained 
directory (so no longer copy them out to Lua folder).
Then do: luarocks install lua

Or is this impossible?
Thijs

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimize network downtime and maximize team effectiveness.
Reduce network management and security costs.Learn how to hire 
the most talented Cisco Certified professionals. Visit the 
Employer Resources Portal
http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/employer_resources/index.html
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers

Reply via email to