On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Sean Conner <s...@conman.org> wrote:
I'm afraid I'm the only one that wants this, but I would really love the
> ability to specify C99 when compiling Lua modules.
>
Absolutely. You should not worry too much about MS, because LR people use
mingw (things like lcomplex work fine!)
> variables =
> {
> CC = "gcc -std=c99"
> }
> }
>
That would be a nice addition to the builtin type. Although it does
over-specify the compiler name I guess. Maybe an extra cflags field (with
corresponding lflags field) would make more sense.
C99 is a great standard - MS just isn't interested in C anymore, but then
I'm not particularly interested in MS either ;)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
