It was thus said that the Great steve donovan once stated:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Sean Conner <s...@conman.org> wrote:
>
> > variables =
> > {
> > CC = "gcc -std=c99"
> > }
> > }
> >
>
> That would be a nice addition to the builtin type. Although it does
> over-specify the compiler name I guess. Maybe an extra cflags field (with
> corresponding lflags field) would make more sense.
It's over specified because doing
CC = "$(CC) -std=c99"
is not always the right thing to do [1]. That's why I want either a
variable like C99 defined, or a boolean flag telling Luarocks to use a C99
compiler.
-spc
[1] For instance, with the Solaris C compiler, you need -xc99 to get C99
behavior.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introducing AppDynamics Lite, a free troubleshooting tool for Java/.NET
Get 100% visibility into your production application - at no cost.
Code-level diagnostics for performance bottlenecks with <2% overhead
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_ap1
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
