this helped, thanks!
should I report it as a bug somewhere?
2014/1/8 Philipp Janda <siffie...@gmx.net>
> Hi!
>
> Am 08.01.2014 06:39 schröbte Wouter Scherphof:
> > Uhm, no, 5.2 actually.
>
> I can confirm the problem.
> Look at the modification date and/or contents of
>
> `~/.cache/luarocks/http___www.luarocks.org_repositories_rocks/manifest-5.2`.
> Mine was from 2013/10/28 and didn't list the newer set rockspecs. After
> renaming `manifest-5.2` an up-to-date version is unpacked and used, and
> the new rockspecs show up in a search. The zip files and timestamp files
> are recent, though.
> Maybe the problem is that UNZIP is set to `unzip -n` which never
> overwrites existing files (changing `-n` to `-o` fixes the problem, but
> as the man page says: `-o` is a dangerous option ...). We should
> probably just remove the extracted manifest before trying to unpack the
> zip file.
>
> Philipp
>
>
> >
> > While http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/ does list the different
> > versions:
> > [image: Inline afbeelding 1]
> >
> > The luarocks command only finds version 0.1 and 0.1.1:
> >
> > mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$ lua -v
> >
> > Lua 5.2.2 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio
> >
> > mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$ sudo luarocks search set
> >
> >
> > Search results:
> >
> > ===============
> >
> >
> >
> > Rockspecs and source rocks:
> >
> > ---------------------------
> >
> >
> > set
> >
> > 0.1.1-1 (rockspec) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks
> >
> > 0.1.1-1 (src) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks
> >
> > 0.1-1 (rockspec) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks
> >
> > 0.1-1 (src) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks
> >
> > mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/11 Hisham <h...@hisham.hm>
> >
> >> On 10 December 2013 10:15, Wouter Scherphof <wouter.scherp...@gmail.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hum.. though I see the rockspec is there, luarocks can’t find it:
> >>>
> >>> MacBook-Pro-van-Wouter:tst wsf$ sudo luarocks install set 0.2
> >>> Error: No results matching query were found.
> >>
> >> Strange, I don't get that. Maybe you're running luarocks using Lua
> >> 5.1? (The dependencies are marked as 5.2-only)
> >>
> >> -- Hisham
> >>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
> organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
> affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
> Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics
> Pro!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Luarocks-developers mailing list
> Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Luarocks-developers mailing list
Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
