Am 08.01.2014 16:30 schröbte Wouter Scherphof: > this helped, thanks! > should I report it as a bug somewhere?
You can open a ticket here[1], but Hisham usually also reads this mailing list ... Philipp [1]: https://github.com/keplerproject/luarocks/issues > > > 2014/1/8 Philipp Janda <siffie...@gmx.net> > >> Hi! >> >> Am 08.01.2014 06:39 schröbte Wouter Scherphof: >>> Uhm, no, 5.2 actually. >> >> I can confirm the problem. >> Look at the modification date and/or contents of >> >> `~/.cache/luarocks/http___www.luarocks.org_repositories_rocks/manifest-5.2`. >> Mine was from 2013/10/28 and didn't list the newer set rockspecs. After >> renaming `manifest-5.2` an up-to-date version is unpacked and used, and >> the new rockspecs show up in a search. The zip files and timestamp files >> are recent, though. >> Maybe the problem is that UNZIP is set to `unzip -n` which never >> overwrites existing files (changing `-n` to `-o` fixes the problem, but >> as the man page says: `-o` is a dangerous option ...). We should >> probably just remove the extracted manifest before trying to unpack the >> zip file. >> >> Philipp >> >> >>> >>> While http://luarocks.org/repositories/rocks/ does list the different >>> versions: >>> [image: Inline afbeelding 1] >>> >>> The luarocks command only finds version 0.1 and 0.1.1: >>> >>> mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$ lua -v >>> >>> Lua 5.2.2 Copyright (C) 1994-2013 Lua.org, PUC-Rio >>> >>> mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$ sudo luarocks search set >>> >>> >>> Search results: >>> >>> =============== >>> >>> >>> >>> Rockspecs and source rocks: >>> >>> --------------------------- >>> >>> >>> set >>> >>> 0.1.1-1 (rockspec) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks >>> >>> 0.1.1-1 (src) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks >>> >>> 0.1-1 (rockspec) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks >>> >>> 0.1-1 (src) - http://www.luarocks.org/repositories/rocks >>> >>> mbp-van-wouter:~ wsf$ >>> >>> >>> 2013/12/11 Hisham <h...@hisham.hm> >>> >>>> On 10 December 2013 10:15, Wouter Scherphof <wouter.scherp...@gmail.com >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hum.. though I see the rockspec is there, luarocks can’t find it: >>>>> >>>>> MacBook-Pro-van-Wouter:tst wsf$ sudo luarocks install set 0.2 >>>>> Error: No results matching query were found. >>>> >>>> Strange, I don't get that. Maybe you're running luarocks using Lua >>>> 5.1? (The dependencies are marked as 5.2-only) >>>> >>>> -- Hisham >>>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Luarocks-developers mailing list Luarocks-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luarocks-developers
