On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:25:54AM +0100, Elie Roux wrote: > Robin Fairbairns a écrit : > >you can't "put <x> in plain" -- plain is under knuth's licence, and if > >you add to it/otherwise change it, you change the name. > > > >so you build a new format for "plain" luatex, the source of which loads > >plain.tex and then does its own thing. > > > >this is the way pdftex and xetex deal with the matter; for example, > >pdftex.ini is > > > > \input pdftexconfig.tex > > \input plain > > \dump > > \endinput > > > > Ok, sorry for my wrong vocabulary... the question with the good words > would be (I think) to know if someone opposes the fact that luatex.ini > gets \input luatexconfig.tex added in it, with luatexconfig being > additional macros like \newattribute.
BTW, luatex.sty also supports plain-TeX and adds \newattribute. Yours sincerely Heiko <[email protected]>
