Hans Hagen <[email protected]> wrote: > Robin Fairbairns wrote: > > > i, for one, had never anticipated all the problems with the switch to > > pdftex; i bet there were those who did, and if this sort of discussion > > had happened then, we might have avoided the worst of the problems. > > part of the problems were probaly due to the fact that in the process > of developing pdftex, some primitive names changesd (even the prefix > changed) simply as part of a cleanup
no: they were (and still are) because of documents misunderstanding what engine they're using, and deploying the wrong graphics support macros. otherwise, the change over has been remarkably smooth. robi
