On 8 March 2010 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 24-2-2010 14:03, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > > Élie Roux wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> While trying to get the \LuaTeX and \LuaLaTeX macros into the > >> LaTeX metalogo package, I tried to make the logos a bit more > >> fancy but still respecting the style of the LuaTeX manual. Here > >> is my attempt. What do you think about it? My personal favorites > >> are proposal 3 for both. > > > > You probably already know how I feel about this: proposal 1 is my > > favorite. > > Indeed. No fancy shifting needed. It also avoids endless > discussions about how to deal with it in whatever font: just > Lua\TeX as we have been using right from the start. > > I don't care about the lualatex logo.
Hans, I fully agree. This "fancy shifting" is ridiculous, of course. But it's actually unavoidable because it was introduced by Knuth and we all know that Knuth is infallible. IMO it's (more than) sufficient if "Lua\TeX" contains "\TeX". In order to avoid endless discussions I think that Taco should decide and carve his decision in stone. Regards, Reinhard -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 Marschnerstr. 25 D-30167 Hannover mailto:[email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
