On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Taco Hoekwater <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/21/2011 10:10 AM, luigi scarso wrote: >>> >>> OFM (Omega's extensions to TFM) allows 65536 glyphs which is more, >>> but still not enough to encode Unicode Math properly. I do not >>> think there is *any* extension to TFM anywhere that supports the >>> full Unicode range. >> >> But OpenType allows only 65536 glyphs, so maybe it's not so serious. > > You get the traditional TeX font encoding issue, only shifted 8 bits. right, but this time it's an OpenType limitation Perhaps one can design an UFM (Unicode extension to TFM) with 32 bit, but still have to fight against the OpenType limitation.
-- luigi
