Taco Hoekwater <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/21/2011 10:17 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Taco Hoekwater<[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 06/21/2011 10:10 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > >>>> > >>>> OFM (Omega's extensions to TFM) allows 65536 glyphs which is more, > >>>> but still not enough to encode Unicode Math properly. I do not > >>>> think there is *any* extension to TFM anywhere that supports the > >>>> full Unicode range. > >>> > >>> But OpenType allows only 65536 glyphs, so maybe it's not so serious. > >> > >> You get the traditional TeX font encoding issue, only shifted 8 bits. > > > > right, but this time it's an OpenType limitation > > Perhaps one can design an UFM (Unicode extension to TFM) with 32 bit, > > but still have to fight against the OpenType limitation. > > I fail to see the usefulness of such an extension.
solves ulrike's problem by providing an easy route ... but what she actually _needs_ is a lua script to dump the tables in the format tex4ht wants. i assume. robin
