>> I also run Arch Linux and ran into this problem when testing svn >> versions of LuaTeX. Are you sure that you copied the binary into >> /usr/bin? > > > no, it is at > > /home/texlive2013/bin/x86_64-linux/luatex > > where all other binaries are. This works fine for the old luatex, also the > PATH is set to this place.
You're right, I realized after posting that you are not using the Arch packages. My setup is very similar, except my TeXLive is in ~/.texlive/2013 > Well, I just replaced the working luatex binary by the one I built. If it > worked for the the old one, it should be fine for the new one, too, no? I just tested this myself and ran into exactly the same problem. I compiled LuaTeX from the newest svn sources and copied it to bin/x86_64-linux. > It's called texmf.cnf here, but I guess that was a typo. What exactly should > I adapt here? Yes, a typo. I tried changing TEXMFROOT to an absolute path. It still doesnt't work. If I don't copy the binary to the right place, it complains that it cannot find temf.cnf. This means that the file is found when the binary in in the right place. Ismo
