On 2013-12-06 Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:01:44PM +0100, Jan Tosovsky wrote: > > > > typographic outputs comparable with Adobe InDesign, but with no > > costs. While > > TeX predates InDesign by 30 years (not counting prototype versions of > TeX), so it is the other way around.
In this particular case I meant availability of microtypography features like protrusion/expansion. > > it takes only raw TeX82 format as an input, when bundled with > > ConTeXt, TeX > > TeX82 is (more or less) the final TeX implementation from Knuth, not a > format. It converts something to PDF. I've try to express 'something' in a way understandable to newbies. Anyway, thanks for clarification. Jan
