On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:45 PM, luigi scarso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:32 PM, David Carlisle <[email protected]> > wrote: > It looks like a bug, probably an oversight because the source code is > similar to the uniformdeviate case which is just before and needs to > scan an int. > I will fix it later this evening or tomorrow in experimental.
Just committed the fix. Now I have A: -65925 B: 114111 C: 5 D: 74 -- luigi
