On 14 November 2016 at 19:15, luigi scarso <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 6:45 PM, luigi scarso <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 5:32 PM, David Carlisle <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> It looks like a bug, probably an oversight because the source code is >> similar to the uniformdeviate case which is just before and needs to >> scan an int. >> I will fix it later this evening or tomorrow in experimental. > > Just committed the fix. Now I have > > A: -65925 > B: 114111 > C: 5 > D: 74 > > > > -- > luigi
thanks. Just rebuilt here and can confirm the fix, David
