On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 15:00, Michael Ableyev wrote: > > Oh, the reason for my packet loss has been acknowledged by RR (after I > practically spammed them with connection logs) as a problem > in the area, although when I called at first they said noone else is > experiencing problems. I think they just acknowledged it as an > area problem so they could say they're working on it and get me off their > backs :/ It's been almost 2 months and I still have an > open trouble ticket, though the frequency of this problem reduced somewhat. > There isn't really anything I can do about it (according > to them).
I originally had severe packet loss and reliability problems with RoadRunner. It took a while for RR to admit (after my 5th modem replacement) that the signal in my area was poor. A few weeks later they finally replaced all the wiring my area and things have been much better since. However, despite this I do not consider RR to be reliable enough for a commercial web/e-mail server at $200 a month. I rather do a co-located server with similar rates and much better reliability and bandwidth. This is exactly what I intend on doing soon.
